Does anyone agree with me that kids these days are getting shorter and shorter childhoods? A notice just went around our township that the state has mandated by the legislature to provide 3 and 4 year old programs next year. Am I against them....NO. Do I think it is something the state needed to waste their time on ....NO. There are plenty of other issues out there that need to be taken care of than robbing young children of childhood.
Ok let me explain before all the out of home working parents jump down my throat..... I do understand that the majority of the parents both work, or single parent have to work. I get that. I also understand that this will help those who have children that qualify with child care service. I think that is one of the positive points actually.
Do I think a 3 year old program will turn into a day care service in the public schools...yup sure do just not a positive one! Do I think that needs to be part of the public school....No way. Three years old is too young to be put in the school system for an all day program. I personally think 4 is also, but that is a little more understandable. I think children are absorbent little sponges and shouldn't be held back from learning. I just think the public is taking over more of what should be the parents jobs. Most 3 year
olds are not potty trained or mature enough in other ways to be in a public school. They should be in a day care, if they have working parents, that is geared toward younger children.
So this is where I stand on the matter. I believe the 3 and 4 year old program could do a lot of good if....they open it to more options. Maybe offer full time and part time learning experiences. If a parent needs their kid to be there all day
ok then so be it...If a parent works part time allow or encourage them to come get their children and spend the rest of the time with them when they are done work. To mandate that if your kid attends the program they have to be there all day...well that is just awful. If it is going to be something that is run by the the public schools anyway, and all kids that are eligible can attend...why not allow they to attend for the learning experience...Let us Mommies that are able to, do our part. We can feed them and give them naps at home.
I love the simple life I live with out all the extras and bells and whistles, because I give that "STUFF" up to stay at home and raise my children, that I decided to have. If I send my children to this program it could benefit them for the first 3 hours after that, having them at home would benefit them
soooooooooo much more. So why not allow that?
Sponges can only absorb so much before they need to be rung out and dunked again. Kids can only learn so much before they need to sleep and start another day.
This program is going to cause little three year
olds (occasionally 2 years
olds since October is the cut off)to ride on a bus or be in a building with children up to their teenage years, all day. It is well known that the teenage years aren't always the best for kids. In a day care most of the time the little ones are less likely to be exposed to those issues that may come about with teens and
pre-teens.
It is decided and there is nothing to do about it now, but my poor little girl who thought she was going to start
pre-school next year and was so excited about it may not get to go. The
pre-school was set up as a half a day program since before I started at that grade school. Now they are changing it to full day only not an option. I don't see the need for her to go there. So, parents that have given up things to raise their own children are the ones who ended up paying in the end. If I want her to start a part time preschool program somewhere I am going to have to pay for a private school. Doesn't make sense that a full day would be free. But it is more important to me that I have as much time with my children as I can since they grow up too fast anyway. Family values aren't learned in schools....and it is not fare they are making them less important.